Document: Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Willem Bogardus: default: demand for fine for fighting with Albert Albertsen and shedding blood: no certain proof: court messenger questioned: fined for non-appearance

Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Willem Bogardus: default: demand for fine for fighting with Albert Albertsen and shedding blood: no certain proof: court messenger questioned: fined for non-appearance|List||Minutes|Case|Arent Cornelisen Vogel v. Walewijn van der Veen: attorney of Jan Pietersen houtsager: demand for payment of debt according to account: counter-claim: referred to arbitrators|Minutes|Case|Luda Meijers v. Paulus Heimans: default: demand for payment of balance of debt: deposit ordered