Document: Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Hendrick Janzen smitt: demand for fine for tapping after hours: disputed: fined

Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Hendrick Janzen smitt: demand for fine for tapping after hours: disputed: fined|List||Minutes|Case|Willem Doeckles v. Albert Gerrisen: demand for payment of debt in wheat: transfer of debt alleged: proof required|Minutes|Case|Paulus Heimans v. Cornelis Janzen houtsager: default: demand for payment of debt according to judgment of 19 December 1662: judgment upheld|Minutes|Case|Hendrick Janzen smitt v. Gijsbert Frerickzen: default: arrest valid